Priority of increasing pay or benefits if given additional law enforcement funding
Full Question Text
If new state or federal funding for law enforcement became available to your jurisdiction, would increasing pay or benefits for current law enforcement officers be a priority for your Board/Council for allocating those funds? (among jurisdictions which provide law enforcement services directly or indirectly)
Total | |
A very high priority | 32% |
Somewhat of a priority | 40% |
Not much of a priority | 14% |
Not a priority at all | 3% |
Don't know | 11% |
County | Township | City | Village | Total | |
A very high priority | 33% | 28% | 35% | 38% | 32% |
Somewhat of a priority | 48% | 37% | 39% | 43% | 40% |
Not much of a priority | 16% | 11% | 20% | 6% | 14% |
Not a priority at all | 3% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 3% |
Don't know | 0% | 20% | 3% | 10% | 11% |
<1500 | 1500-5000 | 5001-10000 | 10001-30000 | >30000 | Total | |
A very high priority | 39% | 29% | 33% | 29% | 29% | 32% |
Somewhat of a priority | 32% | 44% | 38% | 43% | 43% | 40% |
Not much of a priority | 10% | 10% | 11% | 21% | 22% | 14% |
Not a priority at all | 3% | 3% | 7% | 2% | 2% | 3% |
Don't know | 17% | 14% | 11% | 4% | 3% | 11% |
Upper Peninsula | Northern Lower Peninsula | West Central Lower Peninsula | East Central Lower Peninsula | Southwest Lower Peninsula | Southeast Lower Peninsula | Total | |
A very high priority | 35% | 28% | 25% | 34% | 38% | 32% | 32% |
Somewhat of a priority | 42% | 40% | 48% | 39% | 40% | 34% | 40% |
Not much of a priority | 11% | 16% | 11% | 8% | 10% | 20% | 14% |
Not a priority at all | 2% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 2% | 3% | 3% |
Don't know | 10% | 11% | 12% | 14% | 10% | 10% | 11% |
Rural | Mostly rural | Mostly urban | Urban | Don't Know | Total | |
A very high priority | 34% | 28% | 31% | 40% | 66% | 32% |
Somewhat of a priority | 38% | 45% | 45% | 32% | 7% | 41% |
Not much of a priority | 11% | 10% | 21% | 25% | 18% | 14% |
Not a priority at all | 4% | 5% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 3% |
Don't know | 13% | 12% | 3% | 0% | 9% | 10% |