PPT replacement revenue collection
Full Question Text
If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level?
| % within Jurisdiction Type | ||||||
| Jurisdiction Type | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| County | Township | City | Village | |||
| If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? | Revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state | 8% | 10% | 15% | 13% | 11% |
| Revenue should be collected and retained locally | 80% | 62% | 67% | 69% | 65% | |
| Neither, there should be no replacement revenue | 4% | 5% | 3% | 5% | 5% | |
| Don't Know | 9% | 21% | 12% | 13% | 18% | |
| Other | 0% | 1% | 4% | 1% | 1% | |
| % within Population Size | |||||||
| Population Category | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <1500 | 1500-5000 | 5001-10000 | 10001-30000 | >30000 | |||
| If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? | Revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state | 8% | 13% | 15% | 14% | 9% | 11% |
| Revenue should be collected and retained locally | 65% | 62% | 69% | 65% | 78% | 65% | |
| Neither, there should be no replacement revenue | 5% | 6% | 2% | 4% | 2% | 5% | |
| Don't Know | 21% | 19% | 13% | 17% | 7% | 18% | |
| Other | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 5% | 1% | |
| % within Region of Michigan | ||||||||
| MI regions based on State of the State Survey | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper Peninsula | Northern Lower Peninsula | West Central Lower Peninsula | East Central Lower Peninsula | Southwest Lower Peninsula | Southeast Lower Peninsula | |||
| If the Personal Property Tax (PPT) is repealed (in full or in part) and replacement revenue is an option, do you believe the revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state, or should local jurisdictions have greater authority to raise and keep the revenue at the local level? | Revenue should be collected and redistributed by the state | 12% | 8% | 12% | 8% | 13% | 14% | 11% |
| Revenue should be collected and retained locally | 63% | 64% | 64% | 65% | 66% | 66% | 65% | |
| Neither, there should be no replacement revenue | 5% | 6% | 5% | 5% | 1% | 5% | 5% | |
| Don't Know | 17% | 22% | 18% | 22% | 17% | 13% | 18% | |
| Other | 2% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 2% | 2% | 1% | |