Change in jurisdiction's tax delinquencies
Full Question Text
Has there been a decrease, an increase, or no change from the previous fiscal year in tax delinquencies?
% Statewide | ||
Total | ||
---|---|---|
Has there been a decrease, an increase, or no change from the previous fiscal year in tax delinquencies? | Greatly Decreased | 0% |
Somewhat Decreased | 7% | |
No Change | 64% | |
Somewhat Increased | 17% | |
Greatly Increased | 1% | |
Not Applicable | 1% | |
Don't Know | 10% |
% within Jurisdiction Type | ||||||
Jurisdiction Type | Total | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
County | Township | City | Village | |||
Has there been a decrease, an increase, or no change from the previous fiscal year in tax delinquencies? | Greatly Decreased | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Somewhat Decreased | 21% | 6% | 7% | 6% | 7% | |
No Change | 46% | 64% | 72% | 61% | 64% | |
Somewhat Increased | 28% | 17% | 11% | 21% | 17% | |
Greatly Increased | 0% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% | |
Not Applicable | 0% | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% | |
Don't Know | 5% | 11% | 8% | 10% | 10% |
% within Population Size | |||||||
Population Size | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<1500 | 1500-5000 | 5001-10000 | 10001-30000 | >30000 | |||
Has there been a decrease, an increase, or no change from the previous fiscal year in tax delinquencies? | Greatly Decreased | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Somewhat Decreased | 6% | 7% | 4% | 8% | 17% | 7% | |
No Change | 64% | 62% | 71% | 70% | 53% | 64% | |
Somewhat Increased | 16% | 16% | 23% | 15% | 23% | 17% | |
Greatly Increased | 1% | 1% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 1% | |
Not Applicable | 1% | 1% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 1% | |
Don't Know | 11% | 12% | 2% | 7% | 6% | 10% |
% within Region of Michigan | ||||||||
Region of Michigan | Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Upper Peninsula | Northern Lower Peninsula | West Central Lower Peninsula | East Central Lower Peninsula | Southwest Lower Peninsula | Southeast Lower Peninsula | |||
Has there been a decrease, an increase, or no change from the previous fiscal year in tax delinquencies? | Greatly Decreased | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Somewhat Decreased | 3% | 8% | 10% | 6% | 7% | 6% | 7% | |
No Change | 67% | 64% | 58% | 63% | 66% | 69% | 64% | |
Somewhat Increased | 18% | 17% | 18% | 17% | 16% | 17% | 17% | |
Greatly Increased | 0% | 0% | 2% | 1% | 1% | 0% | 1% | |
Not Applicable | 0% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% | 0% | 1% | |
Don't Know | 12% | 8% | 11% | 12% | 10% | 8% | 10% |
% within Urban/Rural Self Identification | |||||||
Urban/Rural Self Identification | Total | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rural | Mostly rural | Mostly urban | Urban | Don't Know | |||
Has there been a decrease, an increase, or no change from the previous fiscal year in tax delinquencies? | Greatly Decreased | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Somewhat Decreased | 6% | 7% | 8% | 6% | 0% | 6% | |
No Change | 63% | 66% | 73% | 61% | 68% | 65% | |
Somewhat Increased | 17% | 19% | 12% | 19% | 8% | 17% | |
Greatly Increased | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% | |
Not Applicable | 1% | 0% | 0% | 4% | 0% | 1% | |
Don't Know | 11% | 8% | 7% | 10% | 24% | 10% |