Jurisdiction negotiated with unions to reduce benefits
Full Question Text
Has your jurisdiction negotiated with unions to reduce benefits to address GASB 45? (Among those jurisdictions which reported having fiscal obligations as a result of offering health care or other retirement benefits)
| % within Jurisdiction Type | |||||
| Jurisdiction Type | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| County | Township | City | Village | ||
| Percentage of jurisdictions which reported having fiscal obligations as a result of post-employment benefits who report having negotiated with unions to reduce benefits to address GASB 45: | 34% | 43% | 59% | 34% | 49% |
| % within Population Size | ||||||
| Population Size | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <1500 | 1500-5000 | 5001-10000 | 10001-30000 | >30000 | ||
| Percentage of jurisdictions which reported having fiscal obligations as a result of post-employment benefits who report having negotiated with unions to reduce benefits to address GASB 45: | 11% | 48% | 49% | 55% | 61% | 49% |
| % within Region of Michigan | |||||||
| Region of Michigan | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper Peninsula | Northern Lower Peninsula | West Central Lower Peninsula | East Central Lower Peninsula | Southwest Lower Peninsula | Southeast Lower Peninsula | ||
| Percentage of jurisdictions which reported having fiscal obligations as a result of post-employment benefits who report having negotiated with unions to reduce benefits to address GASB 45: | 46% | 24% | 41% | 34% | 38% | 66% | 49% |