Jurisdiction stipulated/agreed to an alternate taxable value
Full Question Text
Thinking about any appeals of a Board of Review determination to the Michigan Tax Tribunal in the last two years, did your jurisdiction respond to any appeal by stipulating/agreeing to an alternate taxable value with the landowner prior to the Tax Tribunal hearing? (Among cities and townships that reported having landowners appeal to the Michigan Tax Tribunal)
| % within Jurisdiction Type | |||||
| Jurisdiction Type | Total | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| County | Township | City | Village | ||
| Percentage of jurisdictions that stipulated/agreed to an alternate taxable value with landowner prior to the Tax Tribunal hearing: (Among cities and townships that reported having landowners appeal to the Michigan Tax Tribunal) | ** | 31% | 53% | ** | 37% |
| % within Population Size | ||||||
| Population Size | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <1500 | 1500-5000 | 5001-10000 | 10001-30000 | >30000 | ||
| Percentage of jurisdictions that stipulated/agreed to an alternate taxable value with landowner prior to the Tax Tribunal hearing: (Among cities and townships that reported having landowners appeal to the Michigan Tax Tribunal) | 17% | 31% | 49% | 68% | 46% | 37% |
| % within Region of Michigan | |||||||
| Region of Michigan | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper Peninsula | Northern Lower Peninsula | West Central Lower Peninsula | East Central Lower Peninsula | Southwest Lower Peninsula | Southeast Lower Peninsula | ||
| Percentage of jurisdictions that stipulated/agreed to an alternate taxable value with landowner prior to the Tax Tribunal hearing: (Among cities and townships that reported having landowners appeal to the Michigan Tax Tribunal) | 21% | 34% | 35% | 31% | 35% | 50% | 37% |