Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy

The Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS)
Spring 2011 Data Tables

« Back to the table of contents

Q42c: Has your jurisdiction negotiated with unions to reduce benefits to address GASB 45? (Among those jurisdictions which reported having fiscal obligations as a result of offering health care or other retirement benefits)

Jurisdiction Type Crosstabulation
% within Jurisdiction Type
  Jurisdiction Type Total
County Township City Village
Percentage of jurisdictions which reported having fiscal obligations as a result of post-employment benefits who report having negotiated with unions to reduce benefits to address GASB 45: 34% 43% 59% 34% 49%
Population Category Crosstabulation
% within Population Size
  Population Size Total
<1500 1500-5000 5001-10000 10001-30000 >30000
Percentage of jurisdictions which reported having fiscal obligations as a result of post-employment benefits who report having negotiated with unions to reduce benefits to address GASB 45: 11% 48% 49% 55% 61% 49%
Region of Michigan Crosstabulation
% within Region of Michigan
  Region of Michigan Total
Upper Peninsula Northern Lower Peninsula West Central Lower Peninsula East Central Lower Peninsula Southwest Lower Peninsula Southeast Lower Peninsula
Percentage of jurisdictions which reported having fiscal obligations as a result of post-employment benefits who report having negotiated with unions to reduce benefits to address GASB 45: 46% 24% 41% 34% 38% 66% 49%

« Back to the table of contents