The Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS)
Spring 2011 Data Tables
Question Navigation
« Back to the table of contents
Q42c: Has your jurisdiction negotiated with unions to reduce benefits to address GASB 45? (Among those jurisdictions which reported having fiscal obligations as a result of offering health care or other retirement benefits)
Jurisdiction Type Crosstabulation
% within Jurisdiction Type |
|
Jurisdiction Type |
Total |
County |
Township |
City |
Village |
Percentage of jurisdictions which reported having fiscal obligations as a result of post-employment benefits who report having negotiated with unions to reduce benefits to address GASB 45: |
34% |
43% |
59% |
34% |
49% |
Population Category Crosstabulation
% within Population Size |
|
Population Size |
Total |
<1500 |
1500-5000 |
5001-10000 |
10001-30000 |
>30000 |
Percentage of jurisdictions which reported having fiscal obligations as a result of post-employment benefits who report having negotiated with unions to reduce benefits to address GASB 45: |
11% |
48% |
49% |
55% |
61% |
49% |
Region of Michigan Crosstabulation
% within Region of Michigan |
|
Region of Michigan |
Total |
Upper Peninsula |
Northern Lower Peninsula |
West Central Lower Peninsula |
East Central Lower Peninsula |
Southwest Lower Peninsula |
Southeast Lower Peninsula |
Percentage of jurisdictions which reported having fiscal obligations as a result of post-employment benefits who report having negotiated with unions to reduce benefits to address GASB 45: |
46% |
24% |
41% |
34% |
38% |
66% |
49% |
Question Navigation
« Back to the table of contents