Table of Contents
Fiscal Health
- Good or Bad Times in the coming year?
-
- Better or Less Able to meet jurisdiction's needs this fiscal year than last
- Better or Less Able to meet jurisdiction's needs next fiscal year than this
Changes from the Last Fiscal Year to the Current Fiscal Year
-
- Change in jurisdiction's revenue from property taxes
- Change in jurisdiction’s revenue from fees for services, licenses, transfers, etc.
- Change in jurisdiction’s amount of debt
- Change in jurisdiction’s ability to repay its debt
- Change in amount of federal aid to jurisdiction
- Change in amount of state aid to jurisdiction
- Change in jurisdiction’s tax delinquencies
- Change in jurisdiction’s amount of home foreclosures
- Change in jurisdiction’s public safety needs
- Change in jurisdiction’s infrastructure needs
- Change in jurisdiction’s human service needs
- Change in jurisdiction’s general government operations needs
- Change in jurisdiction’s number of employees
- Change in pay rates for jurisdiction’s employee wages and salaries
- Change in jurisdiction’s cost of government’s employee pensions
- Change in jurisdiction’s cost of government’s current employee health benefits
- Change in jurisdiction’s cost of government’s retired employee health benefits
Expected Changes from the Current Fiscal Year to the Next Fiscal Year
-
- Projected change in property tax rates
- Projected change in charges for fees, licenses, etc.
- Projected change in reliance on general fund balance
- Projected change in reliance on “rainy day” funds
- Projected change in amount of services provided
- Projected change in actual public safety spending
- Projected change in actual infrastructure spending
- Projected change in actual human services spending
- Projected change in actual general government operations spending
- Projected change in funding for economic development programs
- Projected change in amount of debt
- Projected change in sale of public assets
- Projected change in privatizing or contracting out services
- Projected change in number and/or scope of interlocal agreements or other cost-sharing plans with other governments
- Projected change in jurisdiction’s number of employees
- Projected change in employee pay rates
- Projected change in employees’ share of premiums, deductibles, and/or co-pays on health insurance
- Projected change in employees’ share of contributions to retirement funds
- Projected change in retirees’ share of premiums, deductibles, and/or co-pays on health insurance
General Fund Balances
- Jurisdiction’s unreserved general fund balance as a percentage of general fund expenditures last year
- Assessment of level of jurisdiction’s unreserved general fund balance
- Jurisdiction’s cash flow as a fiscal health problem
-
- Jurisdiction's overall fiscal health today
- Jurisdiction's overall fiscal health five years from now
Service Provision
-
- Citizen satisfaction with services provided
- Jurisdiction’s board/council satisfaction with services provided
- Respondent’s satisfaction with services provided
-
- Citizen preference between higher taxes and cuts to police services
- Citizen preference between higher taxes and cuts to fire services
- Citizen preference between higher taxes and cuts to parks/recreation/libraries
- Citizen preference between higher taxes and cuts to roads
- Citizen preference between higher taxes and cuts to public transportation/transit
- Citizen preference between higher taxes and cuts to economic development
- Citizen preference between higher taxes and cuts to utilities
- Citizen preference between higher taxes and cuts to general operations
Local Government Funding
-
- The current system will provide adequate funding to maintain services
- The current system will provide adequate funding to improve or add services
- Is the current system for funding local government in need of significant reform
-
- Support or oppose enabling regional tax-base sharing
- Support or oppose reforming tax increment financing/tax captures
- Support or oppose allowing local-option taxes
- Support or oppose compelling the State to pay for "unfunded mandates"
- Support or oppose increasing maximum allowable local millage rates
- Support or oppose reforming Headlee Amendment to limit millage roll-backs
- Support or oppose establishing automatic millage rate "roll-ups"
- Support or oppose reforming Proposal A to allow more taxable value growth
- Support or oppose restoring full statutory revenue sharing
- Support or oppose adding new services to the state sales tax base
- Support or oppose increasing rates on state sales taxes with revenue-sharing components
- Support or oppose other changes to the system of funding local government
-
- Top priority for reforms to the system of funding local government
- Second priority for reforms to the system of funding local government
- Third priority for reforms to the system of funding local government
-
- Support or oppose increasing local property tax millage rates
- Support or oppose introducing or increasing local income tax
- Support or oppose introducing local sales tax
- Support or oppose introducing local gas tax
- Support or oppose introducing local sales tax on alcohol, tobacco, etc.
- Support or oppose introducing local public utility taxes / fees
- Support or oppose introducing local hotel / tourism tax
- Support or oppose introducing local motor vehicle license / registration fees
- Support or oppose introducing regional tax-base sharing
Drinking Water Issues
- How drinking water is provided in jurisdiction
- Source of shared drinking water system in jurisdiction
-
- Threats to water source quality/safety as a problem in jurisdiction
- Inadequate volume / low water tables as a problem in jurisdiction
- Compliance with state and/or federal regulations as a problem in jurisdiction
- Presence of lead in on-premises plumbing as a problem in jurisdiction
- Presence of lead in service lines as a problem in jurisdiction
- Aging / breaking pipes in the shared water supply system as a problem in jurisdiction
- Affordability / delinquency on water bills as a problem in jurisdiction
- Other problems for drinking water provision in jurisdiction
- Jurisdiction’s role in shared water system(s)
- Overall condition of drinking water infrastructure in jurisdiction
- Change to condition of drinking water systems in last decade
-
- Current condition of drinking water infrastructure as a topic of discussion among Board/Council
- Current condition of drinking water infrastructure as a topic of discussion among citizens
Funding for Drinking Water Infrastructure
-
- Current levels of funding are adequate to maintain drinking water infrastructure
- Current levels of funding are adequate to improve drinking water infrastructure
-
- Use of general fund contributions to fund drinking water
- Use of water rates / user fees to fund drinking water
- Use of special assessments to fund drinking water
- Use of bonds to fund drinking water
- Use of low-interest loans to fund drinking water
- Use of federal / state grants to fund drinking water
- Use of other options to fund drinking water
-
- Support or opposition to increasing water rates or fees by jurisdiction’s Board/Council
- Support or opposition to increasing water rates or fees by jurisdiction’s citizens
- Support or opposition to increasing water rates or fees by respondent personally
Ensuring Safe Drinking Water
-
- How well the Federal government is carrying out responsibility to ensure safe drinking water in jurisdiction
- How well the State government is carrying out responsibility to ensure safe drinking water in jurisdiction
- How well local government is carrying out responsibility to ensure safe drinking water in jurisdiction
Property Tax Appeals
-
- Appeals of property tax assessments for commercial “big box” stores in last two years
- Appeals of property tax assessments for other commercial properties in last two years
- Appeals of property tax assessments for industrial properties in last two years
- Appeals of property tax assessments for residential properties in last two years
- Appeals of property tax assessments for agricultural properties in last two years
- Appeals of property tax assessments for other properties in last two years
- Did any landowners appeal to the Michigan Tax Tribunal
-
- Jurisdiction stipulated/agreed to the value(s) the landowner stated
- Jurisdiction stipulated/agreed to an alternate taxable value
- Jurisdiction defended the assessment before the Tax Tribunal
- Extent to which the cost of legal representation impacted decision to stipulate
- Satisfaction with the Tax Tribunal’s determination(s) in the last two years
- Property tax appeals as a problem for jurisdiction’s fiscal health
- Agree or disagree that tax assessments of retail chain stores should be based on comparable “dark stores”
- Actions jurisdiction has taken to minimize impact of “dark stores” tax appeals
Evaluating current events and political issues
- State of Michigan going in right direction or on wrong track
- Governor Snyder’s job performance
- Michigan Legislature’s job performance