Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy

The Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS)
Fall 2016 Data Tables

« Back to the table of contents | See questionnaire for exact wording

Q13e. To what extent do you support or oppose allowing a State-appointed advisory board to have ongoing oversight powers after the Emergency Manager leaves?

Jurisdiction Type Crosstabulation
% within Jurisdiction Type
  Jurisdiction Type Total
County Township City Village
To what extent do you support or oppose allowing a State-appointed advisory board to have ongoing oversight powers after the Emergency Manager leaves? Strongly Support 23% 10% 18% 9% 11%
Somewhat Support 26% 24% 30% 24% 25%
Neither Support nor Oppose 11% 22% 17% 23% 21%
Somewhat Oppose 20% 16% 16% 14% 16%
Strongly Oppose 8% 17% 12% 19% 16%
Don't Know 10% 12% 6% 10% 10%

Population Size Crosstabulation
% within Population Size
  Population Category Total
<1500 1500-5000 5001-10000 10001-30000 >30000
To what extent do you support or oppose allowing a State-appointed advisory board to have ongoing oversight powers after the Emergency Manager leaves? Strongly Support 8% 10% 16% 22% 23% 11%
Somewhat Support 21% 27% 25% 30% 31% 25%
Neither Support nor Oppose 23% 21% 19% 15% 12% 21%
Somewhat Oppose 15% 17% 20% 17% 15% 16%
Strongly Oppose 20% 15% 11% 7% 16% 16%
Don't Know 13% 10% 9% 9% 2% 10%

Region of Michigan Crosstabulation
% within Region of Michigan
  Region of Michigan Total
Upper Peninsula Northern Lower Peninsula West Central Lower Peninsula East Central Lower Peninsula Southwest Lower Peninsula Southeast Lower Peninsula
To what extent do you support or oppose allowing a State-appointed advisory board to have ongoing oversight powers after the Emergency Manager leaves? Strongly Support 8% 9% 11% 8% 15% 18% 11%
Somewhat Support 20% 22% 22% 27% 27% 30% 25%
Neither Support nor Oppose 21% 22% 20% 26% 18% 16% 21%
Somewhat Oppose 17% 19% 19% 10% 14% 18% 16%
Strongly Oppose 22% 17% 16% 20% 12% 13% 16%
Don't Know 12% 11% 12% 9% 14% 5% 10%