The Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS)
Fall 2009 Data Tables
Question Navigation
« Back to the table of contents
Q25: Has Public Act 312 had a direct impact on your jurisdiction or not?
Jurisdiction Type Crosstabulation
| % within Jurisdiction Type |
| |
Jurisdiction Type |
Total |
| County |
Township |
City |
Village |
| Has Public Act 312 had a direct impact on your jurisdiction or not? |
yes, positive impact |
6% |
1% |
5% |
1% |
2% |
| yes, negative impact |
62% |
4% |
45% |
8% |
14% |
| no impact |
23% |
73% |
43% |
79% |
66% |
| don't know |
9% |
23% |
7% |
11% |
18% |
| Total |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Population Size Crosstabulation
| % within Population Size |
| |
Population Size |
Total |
| <1500 |
1500-5000 |
5001-10000 |
10001-30000 |
>30000 |
| Has Public Act 312 had a direct impact on your jurisdiction or not? |
yes, positive impact |
1% |
1% |
3% |
3% |
12% |
2% |
| yes, negative impact |
3% |
7% |
25% |
45% |
63% |
14% |
| no impact |
76% |
73% |
58% |
39% |
16% |
66% |
| don't know |
20% |
19% |
14% |
13% |
10% |
18% |
| Total |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Region of Michigan Crosstabulation
| % within Region of Michigan |
| |
Region of Michigan |
Total |
| Upper Peninsula |
Northern Lower Peninsula |
West Central Lower Peninsula |
East Central Lower Peninsula |
Southwest Lower Peninsula |
Southeast Lower Peninsula |
| Has Public Act 312 had a direct impact on your jurisdiction or not? |
yes, positive impact |
1% |
2% |
1% |
2% |
0% |
5% |
2% |
| yes, negative impact |
8% |
7% |
15% |
8% |
15% |
28% |
14% |
| no impact |
72% |
68% |
67% |
72% |
65% |
56% |
66% |
| don't know |
19% |
23% |
18% |
19% |
20% |
11% |
18% |
| Total |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
Question Navigation
« Back to the table of contents