The Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS)
Spring 2014 Data Tables
Question Navigation
« Back to the table of contents
Q16d. Did problems monitoring the contract(s) play a part in your jurisdiction's decision to bring the service(s) or operation(s) back in-house?
Jurisdiction Type Crosstabulation
| % within Jurisdiction Type |
| |
Jurisdiction Type |
Total |
| County |
Township |
City |
Village |
| Percentage of jurisdictions which report problems monitoring the contract(s) played a part in their decision to bring service(s) or operation(s) back in-house: (Among those jurisdictions that report bringing back in-house previously contracted out services or operations) |
0% |
17% |
19% |
15% |
16% |
*Columns may not sum to 100% due to rounding within cells.
Population Size Crosstabulation
| % within Population Size |
| |
Population Size |
Total |
| <1500 |
1500-5000 |
5001-10000 |
10001-30000 |
>30000 |
| Percentage of jurisdictions which report problems monitoring the contract(s) played a part in their decision to bring service(s) or operation(s) back in-house: (Among those jurisdictions that report bringing back in-house previously contracted out services or operations) |
16% |
15% |
11% |
26% |
10% |
16% |
*Columns may not sum to 100% due to rounding within cells.
Region of Michigan Crosstabulation
| % within Region of Michigan |
| |
Region of Michigan |
Total |
| Upper Peninsula |
Northern Lower Peninsula |
West Central Lower Peninsula |
East Central Lower Peninsula |
Southwest Lower Peninsula |
Southeast Lower Peninsula |
| Percentage of jurisdictions which report problems monitoring the contract(s) played a part in their decision to bring service(s) or operation(s) back in-house: (Among those jurisdictions that report bringing back in-house previously contracted out services or operations) |
32% |
22% |
18% |
12% |
13% |
13% |
16% |
*Columns may not sum to 100% due to rounding within cells.