Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy

The Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS)
Spring 2014 Data Tables

« Back to the table of contents

Q16c. Did insufficient cost savings play a part in your jurisdiction's decision to bring the service(s) or operation(s) back in-house?

Jurisdiction Type Crosstabulation
% within Jurisdiction Type
  Jurisdiction Type Total
County Township City Village
Percentage of jurisdictions which report insufficient cost savings played a part in their decision to bring service(s) or operation(s) back in-house: (Among those jurisdictions that report bringing back in-house previously contracted out services or operations) 40% 40% 59% 68% 51%
*Columns may not sum to 100% due to rounding within cells.

Population Size Crosstabulation
% within Population Size
  Population Size Total
<1500 1500-5000 5001-10000 10001-30000 >30000
Percentage of jurisdictions which report insufficient cost savings played a part in their decision to bring service(s) or operation(s) back in-house: (Among those jurisdictions that report bringing back in-house previously contracted out services or operations) 53% 40% 56% 38% 84% 51%
*Columns may not sum to 100% due to rounding within cells.

Region of Michigan Crosstabulation
% within Region of Michigan
  Region of Michigan Total
Upper Peninsula Northern Lower Peninsula West Central Lower Peninsula East Central Lower Peninsula Southwest Lower Peninsula Southeast Lower Peninsula
Percentage of jurisdictions which report insufficient cost savings played a part in their decision to bring service(s) or operation(s) back in-house: (Among those jurisdictions that report bringing back in-house previously contracted out services or operations) 44% 38% 27% 31% 79% 61% 51%
*Columns may not sum to 100% due to rounding within cells.