Center for Local, State, and Urban Policy

The Michigan Public Policy Survey (MPPS)
Fall 2010 Data Tables

« Back to the table of contents

Q18. Have the employee protection provisions of the Urban Cooperation Act or other state service-sharing enabling laws had a direct impact on your jurisdiction or not?

Jurisdiction Type Crosstabulation
% within Jurisdiction Type
  Jurisdiction Type Total
County Township City Village
Have the employee protection provisions of the Urban Cooperation Act or other state service-sharing enabling laws had a direct impact on your jurisdiction or not? Yes, a positive impact 4% 2% 4% 1% 3%
Yes, a negative impact 41% 5% 27% 3% 10%
No impact 37% 68% 49% 78% 64%
Don't Know 18% 25% 20% 18% 23%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Population Size Crosstabulation
% within Population Size
Population Size Total
<1500 1500-5000 5001-10000 10001-30000 >30000
Have the employee protection provisions of the Urban Cooperation Act or other state service-sharing enabling laws had a direct impact on your jurisdiction or not? Yes, a positive impact 2% 2% 5% 4% 5% 3%
Yes, a negative impact 2% 7% 16% 31% 50% 10%
No impact 74% 66% 56% 46% 30% 64%
Don't Know 22% 25% 23% 19% 15% 23%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
Region of Michigan Crosstabulation
% within Region of Michigan
Region of Michigan Total
Upper Peninsula Northern Lower Peninsula West Central Lower Peninsula East Central Lower Peninsula Southwest Lower Peninsula Southeast Lower Peninsula
Have the employee protection provisions of the Urban Cooperation Act or other state service-sharing enabling laws had a direct impact on your jurisdiction or not? Yes, a positive impact 3% 1% 1% 3% 4% 5% 3%
Yes, a negative impact 7% 5% 10% 5% 9% 24% 10%
No impact 67% 73% 67% 68% 64% 49% 64%
Don't Know 23% 21% 22% 24% 23% 22% 23%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

« Back to the table of contents